Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses - Núm. 16, Enero 2020 - Jurídicas CUC - Libros y Revistas - VLEX 843967969

Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses

AutorKirill Andreevich Pisenko, Stanislav Lvovich Botvinnik
CargoRussian State University of Justice, Moscow (Russian Federation)/Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow (Russian Federation)
Páginas251-268
.
© The author; licensee Universidad de la Cost a - CUC.
JURÍDIC AS CUC vol. 16 no. 1, pp. 251–268. Enero - Diciembre, 202 0
Barranquil la. ISSN 1692-3030 I mpreso, ISSN 2389-7716 Online
JURÍDICAS CUC, vol. 16 no. 1, pp. 251–268. Enero - Diciembre, 2020
Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas
abusivas por parte de la posición dominante
en la legislación rusa: aspectos para
garantizar un equilibrio de intereses
Protection against imposing unfavorable
contract terms by the dominant party in the
russian legislation: issues of ensuring the
balance of convenience
DOI: htt ps://doi.or g/10.179 81/juridcuc.16 .1.2020.10
Fecha de Recepción: 31/12/2019 Fecha de Aceptación: 02/03/2020
Kirill Andreevich Pisenko
Russian State University of Justice, Moscow (Russian Federation)
kirill_pisenko@mail.ru
Stanislav Lvovich Botvinnik
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow (Russian Federation)
7359 14@ inb ox. ru
.
Para citar este artículo:
Andreevich, K. & Lvovich, S. (202 0). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por
parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantiza r un equilibrio de
intereses. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 251–268. DOI: http:/ /dx.d oi.or g/10.179 81/j urid cuc.16 .1.20 20.10
.
Resumen
Los problemas legales de contrarrestar la imposición
de términos desfavorables del contrato por dominante
forman un complejo de problemas teóricos y prácticos.
Los autores de este artículo intentan determ inar la
naturaleza legal de la “imposición”, así como desarrollar
enfoques para resolver los problemas de la resistencia
integral a esta violación para gar antizar un equilibrio
de intereses. La base losóca y concepcional es, en pri-
mer lugar, la idea de un equilibrio de intereses, como la
base objetiva de la regulación legal. Entre los principales
métodos  losócos y cientícos utilizados en el trabajo,
en particular, son dialéct ico, legal formal, hermenéutica
legal, legal comparado, empírico. La base teórica es el
trabajo en el derecho civil, administrativo, empresaria l
y procesal. La naturaleza legal de la i mposición como la
violación debe determinarse por la lógica general de la
regulación a ntimonopolio. La posibi lidad del uso paralelo
de los recursos de derecho público y privado requiere el
desarrollo de medios legales procesales par a garantizar
una práctica uniforme de aplicación de la ley, un equi-
librio de intereses. En primer lugar, la unidad de los
enfoques en el marco del derecho público y los recursos del
derecho civil deben relacionarse con la determinación de
los signos y el contenido de los elementos de la imposición.
También se proponen los enfoques para la formación de
un modelo procesal apropiado.
Palabras clave: Acuerdo; derecho antimonopolio; equi-
librio de intereses; imposición; derecho público; pleito
Abstract
Legal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavor-
able contract terms by the dominant party raise a number
of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the
article try to determine the legal natu re of imposition and
develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this
violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience.
From the philosophical perspective and a cer tain world-
view, the study is based on the balance of convenience
regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation.
The main philosophical and scientic methods used in
this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal
method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the
comparative-leg al and empirical method s. The theor eti-
cal basis is represented by scientic works in the eld
of civil, administrative, entrepreneuria l and procedural
branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type
of violation should be determined with due regard to the
general logic of antitrust regulation. The pa rallel use
of both public and private law necessitates the develop-
ment of procedural legal means ensuring un iform law
enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all,
the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public
and civil law should be concerned with the denition
of features and the essence of elements compiling the
imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to
the formation of an appropriate procedural model.
Keywords: Ag reement; antitrust law; balance of conve-
nience; imposition; public law; tort.
PROTECCIÓN CONTR A LA IMPOSICIÓN DE CLÁUSUL AS ABUSIVAS POR PARTE DE LA POSICIÓN
DOMINAN TE EN LA LEGISLACIÓN RUSA: ASPEC TOS PARA GA RANTIZA R UN EQUILIBRIO DE INT ERESES
252
IntroductIon
According to Yarmonova (2019), “social relations become more com-
plicated, therefore law needs to be more exible and dynamic” (pp.
2-2). It seems that this thesis should be claried, specied and
conditionally accepted for out-of-context use. Sometimes excessive
dynamism can be unjustied, while stable and conservative law is
more consistent with the balance of convenience. In addition, ex-
ibility can hardly serve as an absolute category that denes one of the
imperatives of legal development. In different situations, it is obvious
that dynam ism and legal exibilit y can entai l var ious c onsequence s
for purposes of regulation and law enforcement, which are not always
positive. We cannot but agree with Yarmonova that regulation really
lags behind social relations and results in conicting law enforce-
ment and imbalance. The need for dynamism and legal changes is
clearly manifested and recognized but it is necessary to follow the
original idea of law, i.e. to ensure the balance of convenience based
on the principle of equity. These changes should be effective and
guarantee the balance of convenience in the changing conditions of
forming new and more complicated social relations.
Thus, it is quite logical that public authorities should ensure the
compliance of positive law and rapidly developing social relations.
However, the current legislation lags on a number of issues and its
position is not clear enough or completely unclear. One of the issues
requiring more detailed and purposeful legislative regulation is
the legal nature of violated antitrust rules, as well as the grounds,
order and ratio of using legal remedies against these violations. One
of such violations is the imposition of unfavorable contract terms on
the counterparty by the dominant party (hereinafter referred to as
“imposition”).
The foregoing is relevant in the context of distinguishing between
essential elements and actual violations of antitrust law that is cru-
cial for considering the Russian antitrust problems. In this article,
we try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop
approaches to counteracting such violations in order to ensure the
balance of convenience.

Para continuar leyendo

Solicita tu prueba

VLEX utiliza cookies de inicio de sesión para aportarte una mejor experiencia de navegación. Si haces click en 'Aceptar' o continúas navegando por esta web consideramos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. ACEPTAR